# Tag Archives: van der waerden

## An arithmetic van der Corput trick and the polynomial van der Waerden theorem

The van der Corput difference theorem (or trick) was develop (unsurprisingly) by van der Corput, and deals with uniform distribution of sequences in the torus. Theorem 1 (van der Corput trick) Let be a sequence in a torus . If … Continue reading

## Rado’s theorem and Deuber’s theorem

In this post I talk about (and prove) a fundamental theorem of Rado in Ramsey’s theory. I will prove “half” of the theorem and will postpone the second part of the proof to a future post. To better appreciate Rado’s … Continue reading

## Hales-Jewett and a generalized van der Warden Theorems

The Hales-Jewett theorem is one of the most fundamental results in Ramsey theory, implying the celebrated van der Waerden theorem on arithmetic progressions, as well an its multidimensional and IP versions. One interesting property of the Hales-Jewett’s theorem is that … Continue reading

## Arithmetic progressions and the affine semigroup

— 1. Introduction — Van der Waerden’s theorem on arithmetic progressions states that, given any finite partition of , one of the cells contains arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions. For the sake of completion we give a precise formulation. Theorem 1 … Continue reading

## Brauer’s theorem and a coloring trick of Bergelson

— 1. Introduction — Ramsey theory concerns essentially two types of results: coloring and density results. Coloring results state that given a finite partition of some structured set (usually ) one of the cells in the partition still has some … Continue reading

## Double van der Waerden

— 1. Introduction — In a previous post I presented a proof of van der Waerden’s theorem on arithmetic progressions: Theorem 1 (van der Waerden, 1927) Consider a partition of the set of the natural numbers into finitely many pieces … Continue reading

## Hales-Jewett Theorem

— 1. Introduction — One of the earliest posts I wrote on this blog contained a proof of the van der Waerden’s Theorem on arithmetic progressions. That proof was topological in nature and illustrated the interesting relation between some problems … Continue reading